release version 0.2.1

This commit is contained in:
Pascal Kuthe 2023-09-02 14:50:54 +02:00
parent 323a6973ba
commit 9e413c76b9
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: D715E8655AE166A6
4 changed files with 10 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -1,10 +1,15 @@
# Changelog
## nucleo-matcher
# [0.2.1] - 2023-09-02
## Bugfixes
* ensure matcher runs on first call to `tick`
# [0.2.0] - 2023-09-01
*initial public release*
[0.2.1]: https://github.com/helix-editor/nucleo/releases/tag/nucleo-v0.2.1
[0.2.0]: https://github.com/helix-editor/nucleo/releases/tag/nucleo-v0.2.0

2
Cargo.lock generated
View File

@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ dependencies = [
[[package]]
name = "nucleo"
version = "0.2.0"
version = "0.2.1"
dependencies = [
"nucleo-matcher",
"parking_lot",

View File

@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
name = "nucleo"
description = "plug and play high performance fuzzy matcher"
authors = ["Pascal Kuthe <pascal.kuthe@semimod.de>"]
version = "0.2.0"
version = "0.2.1"
edition = "2021"
license = "MPL-2.0"
repository = "https://github.com/helix-editor/nucleo"

View File

@ -3,6 +3,8 @@
`nucleo` is a highly performant fuzzy matcher written in rust. It aims to fill the same use case as `fzf` and `skim`. Compared to `fzf` `nucleo` has a significantly faster matching algorithm. This mainly makes a difference when matching patterns with low selectivity on many items. An (unscientific) comparison is shown in the benchmark section below.
> Note: If you are looking for a replacement of the `fuzzy-matcher` crate and not a fully managed fuzzy picker, you should use the [`nulceo-matcher`](https://crates.io/crates/nucleo-matcher) crate.
`nucleo` uses the exact **same scoring system as fzf**. That means you should get the same ranking quality (or better) as you are used to from fzf. However, `nucleo` has a more faithful implementation of the Smith-Waterman algorithm which is normally used in DNA sequence alignment (see https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~ckingsf/bioinfo-lectures/gaps.pdf) with two separate matrices (instead of one like fzf). This means that `nucleo` finds the optimal match more often. For example if you match `foo` in `xf foo` `nucleo` will match `x__foo` but `fzf` will match `xf_oo` (you can increase the word length the result will stay the same). The former is the more intuitive match and has a higher score according to the ranking system that both `nucleo` and fzf.
**Compared to `skim`** (and the `fuzzy-matcher` crate) `nucleo` has an even larger performance advantage and is often around **six times faster** (see benchmarks below). Furthermore, the bonus system used by nucleo and fzf is (in my opinion) more consistent/superior. `nucleo` also handles non-ascii text much better. (`skim`s bonus system and even case insensitivity only work for ASCII).